Competitor Comparison
Discover how leading air purifiers measure up to the HA500. Below, we’ve compared some of the most popular home air filters side by side, so you can see how they stack up against the ever‑reliable HA500.
Specification
Bacteria RR*
Virus RR*
NOx RR*
SOx RR*
Harmful release
CADR**
Wattage
Air Flow Tech.
HA500
99.9%
H1N1 99.9%
HCoV-229E 99.99%
HCoV-229E 99.99%
99.8%
99.8%
N/A
500 (m^3/h)
4-40 W
Optimised pattern
Dyson
99.9%
99.9%
N/A
N/A
Ozone
250 (m^3/h)
2000 W
Clean air short circuit
Philips AC4076/18
99.9%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Secondary
380 (m^3/h)
60 W
Sucks in dust, Unoptimised
BlueAir 580i
99.9%
99.9%
N/A
N/A
Ozone
600 (m^3/h)
50 W
Sucks in dust, Unoptimised
AtmosAir Everest
N/A
MS2 99%
HCoV-229E 99%
HCoV-229E 99%
N/A
N/A
Ozone
320 (m^3/h)
60 W
Sucks in dust, Unoptimised
Defend 400
99.99%
SARSCoV-2 99.99%
N/A
N/A
Ozone
380 (m^3/h)
24 W
Sucks in dust, Unoptimised
EZVIZ UV-C Air Purifier
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ozone & Secondary
350 (m^3/h)
80 W
Sucks in dust, Unoptimised
EVA Alto four
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ozone & Secondary
310 (m^3/h)
55 W
Sucks in dust, Unoptimised
* RR = Removal Rate
** CADR = Clean Air Delivery Rate
